Retargeter Customer Service Versus Safety?

Receive New Posts in your Email

Your email:

The PhaseWare Files
Articles, Observations, and Ideas
about Customer Support

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Customer Service Versus Safety?

  
  
  
  
  
  

This was cross-posted from our ITtoolbox blog: Turning a Helpless Desk into a Helpful Support Desk.

Which Comes First, Customer Service or Safety

 

I was reading the article in USA Today about the Mom Cyclist and her social media triumph over a service refusal at a local burger chain; one that touts its "green-ness" and so would seem a place that would embrace bicyclists.

And I'm torn.

First of all, there is the expectation of giving great customer service to each and every customer and meeting customers where they want to be met. Secondly, it seems this same burger place had served her at the drive through earlier. Plus, this took place in Oregon where environmental awareness is the state motto. So maybe the establishment should have planned for bike riding customers when it built the drive through.

On the other hand, I do believe there is a safety issue that needs to be taken into consideration. Ms. Gilbert is quoted as saying that bicyclists aren't dangerous, so why are they banned from drive through windows? I say, bicyclists may not be dangerous, but cars are. And the drive through is designed for cars. I don't know about Oregon, but down here in Texas, going to the drive through on a bike is likely to get you run over by an iPhone wielding Soccer Mom. I think we all know which vehicle would come out the worst. And while it is great to want to serve customers however they want to be served, it seems in this case as though we are not to consider the risk of doing so.

Does this mean the customer shoulders all the risk when choosing to be served in this way? What responsibility does the business have in the event the worst happens? I know this makes it seem to come down to the corporate lawyers again, where customer service can be a distant second to making sure you don't get sued. But does a line need to be drawn?

I compliment Ms. Gilbert on her efforts to walk the talk of exercise and environmentalism. I know I wouldn't get far on a bike with three kids riding on the back.

But I am also concerned that, in this case, safety is being ignored. Unless a separate "bike-through" is going to be built, am I being too risk averse to offer great service? Or am I being sensible about not wanting my customers to be pancaked by a distracted driver?

What say you: is this story a case of a customer fighting for good service using her social reach? Or is this s a case of a customer asking for too much and threatening business disaster by Twitter if she is denied her desire?

 

 

 

Free White Paper Download

Thinking about going multichannel? If you are thinking of adding live chat in customer support, download our free white paper for more information:

Give Your Customers the Gift of Chat

Thank you for reading our blog. Leave comments and don't forget to use the social bookmarking widgets to spread the news!

Comments

As a person who is legally blind and cannot drive a car, bicycling is my only mode of legal transport. Most fast food places lack a secure location, or even object to chain a bike to, and suppose i forget to bring a lock with me? Quite frankly, I'm less worried about the car behind me waiting for food than I am the one who has just gotten their food and is driving while eating with both hands! PLEASE, quit protecting me when you arent in my shoes. Bicyclists can and should be allowed at the drive up windows. Drive through is much safer than risking theft, and yes, we should secure our food rather than sling the bag around on the handlebars. A driver who cant negotiate following a bicycle through a fast food takeout window DOES NOT NEED A LICENSE!
Posted @ Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:31 PM by Rob
I can certainly understand the frustration of being in the minority of not being able to run a car. However, banning bikes from drive through windows wasn't really the point of my post.  
 
My issue is with the type of negative publicity that can occur due to the ubiquity of the internet and social media. 
 
If a business has chosen to protect themselves by posting that a customer may not perform a certain action, is it OK for that customer to then cause damage to the business through negative social media strikes? 
 
In this case, the business was following a posted warning, made for the purpose of safety and protection from liability. For all we know, that municipality or state requires that such posting and practice be made and followed. It wouldn't be up to the business at all then. 
 
With that in mind, do you feel that it is OK to cause loss of business by an action that has a larger consequence and action than prior to the social media age? Even though the business was following a law or even just protecting itself?
Posted @ Thursday, July 28, 2011 8:06 AM by Jody Pellerin
Comments have been closed for this article.